next up previous
Next: Notes on individual objects Up: Observations and data analysis Previous: Observations

Line profile fitting

Morgan (1958, 1959) has introduced a classification of galaxies based on their nuclear region stellar population. Classes ``a'' and ``af'' are dominated by early-type stars. The main absorption features are the Balmer lines, which are usually filled up by emission as these objects invariably contain a H II region. Classes ``g'', ``gk'' and ``k'' are dominated by a bulge of old population II stars. Intermediate classes ``f'' and ``fg'' have, in addition to a population of young stars, a faint bulge of old stars. The old star population have similar spectra in all classes (Bica 1988). AGN activity is exceptional in classes ``a'' and ``af'' but frequent in all other classes (Véron & Véron-Cetty 1986); in consequence, the nuclear region of most AGNs contains a population of old stars with many strong absorption lines which can make the line fitting analysis rather difficult, especially for the blue spectra. Therefore, when the absorption blend Mgib $\lambda$5175 was prominent, we subtracted a suitable fraction of the spectrum of the elliptical galaxy NGC 5982, used as a template, to remove the old stellar population contribution. Another elliptical, NGC 4365, was used as a template for the red spectra, while NGC 821 was used for both the red and blue spectra obtained in October and November 1997. All templates were observed with the same spectral resolution as the emission-line galaxies.

Whenever necessary, we have added a $\rm H\alpha$ or $\rm H\beta$ absorption component; as, usually, the $\rm H\alpha$ absorption line is completely filled up by the emission lines, we assumed its intensity to be 1.8 times the intensity of the nearby absorption Ca I$\lambda$6495 line (Véron-Cetty & Véron 1986b). Whenever a template and/or absorption component was used in a fit, this is indicated in Table [*] which contains the line fitting analysis results for the 53 observed galaxies.


 
Table:  Spectrograph settings and standard stars.
Date          $\lambda$ Range (Å) Standard stars
21 - 22.03.95 6500 - 7400 BD 262606
09 - 10.05.96 6700 - 7600 GD 140, BD 262606
11 - 13.05.96 4860 - 5760 Feige 98, Kopff 27
08.06.96 4860 - 5760 Feige 66, Kopff 27
09.06.96 6700 - 7600 Feige 66, BD 284211
15 - 16.07.96 4675 - 5575 BD 284211
23 - 25.07.96 6335 - 7235 BD 284211
07.01.97 4720 - 5620 EG 247
10.01.97 6175 - 7075 EG 247
04 - 07.03.97 4825 - 5725 Feige 66
08 - 12.03.97 6310 - 7210 Feige 66
13.03.97 4825 - 5725 Feige 66
31.10.97 6455 - 7365 Feige 24
01 - 02.11.97 4655 - 5560 Feige 24


 
Table:  Journal of observations. A: 66 Åmm-1, red; B: 66 Åmm-1, blue. A ``*'' indicates objects published in Paper I.
Name Disp. Date Exp. time PA Name Disp. Date Exp. time PA
      (min) ()       (min) ()
Mark 938 A 31.10.97 20 90 UGC 8621 A 10.05.96 20 180
  B 01.11.97 20 180   B 11.05.96 20 179
Mark 957 A 10.01.97 20 90 Mark 266SW A 10.01.97 20 180
  B 01.11.97 20 270   B 07.03.97 20 215
IRAS 01346-0924* A 10.01.97 20 90 Mark 266NE B 07.03.97 20 215
Mark 1066 A 10.01.97 20 90 Mark 1361* B 06.03.97 20 180
  B 07.01 97 20 90 Mark 461 A 22.03.95 20 90
IRAS 03355+0104 A 10.01.97 20 90   B 08.06.96 20 89
  B 04.03.97 20 90 4C 26.42 A 09.06.96 20 90
IRAS 04210+0400 A 10.01.97 20 90   B 13.05.96 20  
  B 07.01.97 20 90 I Zw 81 A 10.05.96 20 180
IRAS 04507+0358 A 10.01.97 20 90   B 11.05.96 20 84
  B 06.03.97 20 180 Mark 477* B 11.05.96 20 120
VII Zw 73 A 10.01.97 20 180 Mark 848S A 22.06.96 20 171
  B 07.01.97 20 180   B 08.06.96 20 90
Mark 622 A 10.01.97 20 180 IRAS 15184+0834 A 08.03.97 20 270
  B 07.01.97 20 180   B 07.03.97 20 270
3C 198.0 A 12.03.97 20 270 NGC 5953 A 10.05.96 20 180
KUG 0825+248 A 08.03.97 20 220   B 11.05.96 20 180
  B 07.03.97 20 217 Kaz 49 A 22.06.96 20 180
IRAS 09111-1007E A 08.03.97 20 258   B 23.06.96 20 180
  B 05.03.97 20 252 IRAS 16129-0753 A 22.06.96 20 180
Zw 238.066 A 08.03.97 20 180   B 15.07.96 20 180
  B 07.01.97 20 90 IRAS 16382-0613 A 09.05.96 20 180
UGC 5101 A 10.03.97 20 270   B 13.05.96 20  
  B 06.03.97 20 180 Mark 700 A 09.05.96 20 180
NGC 2989 A 09.03.97 20 270   B 07.06.96 20 90
  B 06.03.97 20 180   B 08.06.96 20 90
CG 49 A 10.05.96 20 180 MCG 03.45.003* B 13.05.96 20  
  B 01.11.97 20 270 PGC 61548* A 09.05.96 20 180
NGC 3185 A 08.03.97 20 270   B 13.05.96 20  
  B 06.03.97 20 180 Kaz 214 A 09.06.96 20 139
Arp 107A A 09.03.97 20 270   B 13.05.96 20  
NGC 3504 A 08.03.97 20 270 NGC 6764 A 09.06.96 20 253
  B 07.03.97 20 180   B 08.06.96 20 72
IRAS 11058-1131* B 06.03.97 20 180 IRAS 22114-1109 A 24.07.96 20 180
NGC 3642 A 08.03.97 20 270   A 25.07.96 20 180
  B 07.03.97 20 180   B 15.07.96 20 180
Mark 1291 A 10.01.97 20 180   B 16.07.96 20 180
  B 06.03.97 20 180 Mark 308* A 09.06.96 20 44
IRAS 11285+8240A A 10.05.96 20 180 Mark 522 A 23.07.96 20 180
Mark 739W A 09.01.97 20 90   B 15.07.96 20 180
  B 07.03.97 20 272 Mark 313 A 23.07.96 20 180
SBS 1136+594 A 10.01.97 20 180   B 15.07.96 20 180
  B 05.03.97 20 180 Zw 453.062 A 25.07.96 20 225
NGC 3994 A 08.03.97 20 270   B 01.11.97 20 270
  B 13.03.97 20 180   B 02.11.97 60 270
NGC 4102 A 21.03.95 20 90 IC 5298 A 25.07.96 15 204
  B 04.03.97 15 270   B 02.11.97 60 270
IRAS 12474+4345S A 11.03.97 20 345          
  B 13.03.97 20 345          



  Table 6:  Fitting profile analysis results. Col. 1 gives the name of the object, col. 2 the adopted redshift, cols. 4 and 9 the velocities for each set of components measured on the blue and red spectra, respectively, and de-redshifted using the redshift given in col. 2; cols. 5 and 10 the corresponding FWHM, cols. 6, 11 and 12 the intensity ratios $\lambda$5007/H$\beta$, $\lambda$6583/H$\alpha$ and $\lambda$6300/H$\alpha$ respectively, and cols. 7 and 13 the fraction of the $\rm H\beta$ emission flux (respectively $\rm H\alpha$) in each component with respect to the total flux of the line in each object. A ``T'' in col. 3 (or 8) indicates that the blue (or red) spectrum has been corrected for starlight using a suitable fraction of a template (in the blue, we have used the elliptical galaxy NGC 5982 and in the red, the elliptical galaxy NGC 4365; NGC 821 was used as a template for the objects observed in October and November 1997); in the same columns, an ``A'' indicates that a $\rm H\beta$ (or $\rm H\alpha$) absorption component was added to the model. In col. 14 we give the velocity difference between the blue and red systems, and in col. 15 the spectroscopic classification of each component in the model; Gaussian profiles were used throughout, except when indicated by ``lz'' (Lorentzian profile). Values in parenthesis have been fixed.


  Table 6: Fitting profile analysis results (continued).

  Table 6: Fitting profile analysis results (continued).

  Table 6: Fitting profile analysis results (end).


The line fitting analysis of the spectra was done in terms of Gaussian components as described in Véron et al. (1980, 1981b,c). The three emission lines, $\rm H\alpha$ and [N II]$\lambda\lambda$6548, 6583 (or $\rm H\beta$ and [O III]$\lambda\lambda$4959, 5007) were fitted by one or several sets of three Gaussian components; whenever necessary, two components were added to fit the Oi$\lambda\lambda$6300, 6363 lines. The width and redshift of each component in a set were supposed to be the same. The intensity ratios of the [N II]$\lambda\lambda$6548, 6583, [O III]$\lambda\lambda$4959, 5007 and Oi$\lambda\lambda$6300, 6363 lines were taken to be equal to 3.00, 2.96 and 3.11, respectively (Osterbrock 1974). Whenever a fit resulted in a small negative intensity for a $\rm H\beta$ component, we set the corresponding $\lambda$5007/H$\beta$ ratio to 10, the mean value for Seyfert 2s. All line widths given in this paper have been corrected for the instrumental broadening. The spectra and best fits are plotted in Fig. [*], the parameters describing the individual components required by the analysis being given in Table [*].


next up previous
Next: Notes on individual objects Up: Observations and data analysis Previous: Observations

12/15/1998