next up previous
Next: Comparison with Cephei Up: FWHM and turbulent velocity Previous: FWHM curve

Turbulent velocity variation

The third and the smallest peak of the observed FWHM curve, seen at $\varphi=0.7$, as shows the analysis, is entirely due to the increase of the microturbulence.


  
Figure: Predicted turbulent velocity variation with phase, deduced from the FWHM theoretical fit
\begin{figure}
\resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics{fig4.ps}}\end{figure}

With vturb=0, the theoretical FWHM curve shows only a weak bump two times smaller than observed. Figure[*] shows the predicted variations of vturb deduced from the FWHM of the FeII line (Fig.[*]). Keeping in mind the notes made above, in the phase region 0.95-1.1 we reconstructed the vturb curve in a semi-quantitative manner (dashed line).

The reason for a sharp peak at $\varphi=0.94$ is just the numerical result mentionned above that without sharp turbulence amplification at this phase the theoretical minimum of FWHM is too low with respect to observed one. This turbulence peak is probably related to the amplification caused by shock s2, present in our model. If, however, the shock s2 in not present in the real star, the theoretical vturb peak may probably be the result of underestimation of FWHM due to certain nonadequacy of the description of this very fast phase of model pulsation. Further more sophisticated modelling is then required to clarify this question.

As seen from the figure, vturb rapidly grows between $\varphi=0.6$ and 0.7 up to about 7km/s from its ``basic'' level of about 2km/s. After that it decreases slowly until $\varphi=0.9$ , almost linearly with phase. A comparison with the density diagram (Fig. [*]) shows that the origin for this turbulence amplification is most probably the density increase due to another early shock (s3' in Fokin & Gillet, 1997), which pass through the LFR from phase about 0.6 until 0.8. It is rapid enough to provoke by $\varphi=0.7$ the maximum compression in all the line formation region. As a result, at this phase the predicted vturb reaches its maximum of about 7 km/s (Fig.[*]) , for the observed FWHM is a result of integration of the flux over the whole LFR.

A characteristic feature of RR Lyrae atmospheres is that at the compression phase, the deeper layers are more accelerated by gravity than the upper ones due to considerable extention of the atmosphere. As a result, the density in the atmosphere generally $\it decreases$ during the global compression phase, as can be seen from Fig.[*]. This explain the decrease of vturb after its maximum at $\varphi=0.7$.


next up previous
Next: Comparison with Cephei Up: FWHM and turbulent velocity Previous: FWHM curve

8/13/1998